Zune Software Trip Report

August 29, 2007

The other day woot.com had a good deal on the Microsoft Zune, and I had wanted a 30GB player for a while so I pounced on it. I got it today and haven’t really spent a lot of time with it but I do have some comments.

The Zune application (on the PC, not the player) is an excellent lesson in UI design, both how to and now not to do things. Microsoft did a really good job on making it easy for Aunt Tillie to set up a Zune, but a guy like me can hit a lot of snags in the process. First, I had no visual feedback on the initial synchronization because I lost track of the privacy options dialog I was using to turn off the usage data; since it never got closed the setup dialogs never fully shut down and I didn’t see the Zune application itself until I accidentally stumbled upon the dialog again. MS should have made it topmost or at the very least a child form of the setup dialog, particularly since the Zune app won’t display until it’s gone.

Setting up your library is painless… if you have been organized from the start and don’t have special requirements. The Zune combs your My Music folder and assimilates any audio and playlist files it can find. This was a problem for me since over the years I’ve switched media players and ripping methods several times. I was primarily using my iTunes playlists, and Zune picked them up fine but for some reason decided to make a copy of each so it could include the playlist twice in my list.

When I set about pruning folders I didn’t want from the library, it turned out to be a hassle. See, Zune knows that other media players are too complicated and concepts such as “add just this file” are too confusing for the user to deal with. Zune keeps your library by accepting a list of folders which it will monitor for new files. Unfortunately, if you add a folder, then remove some items from the library, it’s going to add them back the next time it checks the directory. The only way I have found to selectively add files is to first add the individual folder the files are in, then tell Zune to not monitor that folder, then delete the files you don’t want. This sounds fine, but I have a list of about 15 folders and Zune is only monitoring 1. It would have been much better to let people who know what they are doing add files manually.

The sync process needs work. My initial sync had about 200 “errors”. The error was described as “The file has no media rights” or whatever the message that means your file isn’t DRMed means. I spent about 15 minutes looking for a solution to this until I thought to check the device itself. The error messages were spurious and all of the files were present on my device. I don’t really know what the deal was there.

Putting photos and videos on the thing is kind of unintuitive. You have to make a playlist that you add videos or photos to, then you tell Zune to sync that playlist with your device. On the device, the playlists don’t exist, and your navigation options are file date or the folder the picture was in on your PC. This is awful if your images are already organized by rough date on the PC. I synced about 30 images in my first test and there’s no real way to pick just the images from that list. Also I have yet to figure out how to get the videos/images that came preloaded off of the blasted thing.

All in all, the application suffers from trying too hard to deliver an easy user experience; somewhere along the line Microsoft forgot to provide an interface for experienced users as well. I found iTunes extremely difficult to use compared to WinAmp when I first made the move, but over time I learned it just had a special way of doing things and I came to like it. I don’t think this will happen with the Zune media player because I’ve already effectively hit the top of the learning curve; there’s no advanced functionality for me to learn that will make my experience easier. Unfortunately, as is the case with most media devices, I have to have this software to sync with the Zune device.

I’m very pleased with the hardware itself but I’ve had much less interaction with it than I have had with the software at this point, so I’m reserving comments until the Zune has spent a day at the office with me tomorrow.

This may have to become what I wanted

August 23, 2007

I strongly urge anyone that reads this to avoid using the hosting service at http://www.fuitadnet.com at all costs. In the past, they have proved unreliable but the recent debacle has convinced me that it’s finally worth finding a new hosting provider. As such, I can only rely on this blog at the moment.

I signed up for Fuitadnet years ago when I was a lot bigger into the internet. They had an ad banner on the Something Awful forums (which I lurked frequently at the time) and the deal seemed worth it: for about 5 bucks I got more bandwidth than I’d ever use and disk space to match. There was no real problems with it for as long as I remember, every now and then the servers would be down but for what I was paying and how low-traffic my site was I didn’t see any reason to get upset.

About a year ago we were notified via the forums and I believe emails that there would be a price increase (the post).  It was only about $2 per month for me and $7/month was still pretty trivial so I didn’t care.  I looked over the explanation for the increase and was particularly pleased with the nightly backup, since it meant I wouldn’t have to worry about backing up the databases for the PHP toy projects I had.

The only real things that had me upset with them were that in order to use any apps they had I had to set folders to world-writable on the server.  I may be wrong but I was under the impression that there was no good reason to do this, and that PHP should be running in a process that could be given access to the directories.  I posted about this in the forums and was told I was probably on an older server and should file a move request via support.  I did this, and the support engineer assured me everything was taken care of.  In fact, all he did was set the directories to world-writable.

The next big problem I had was an instance where a script kiddie got loose on my server and defaced my site, along with others.  I seem to remember it took a week or so before Fuitadnet made a response explaining what had happened.  This was after they restored an old backup without warning.  Apparently someone had an insecure script that allowed entry, that was the excuse they gave.  This kind of agitated me because it took a few days of people filing support tickets and asking about it on the forums to get an explanation.

This month has been the final straw.  Some time at the end of July several sites went completely down, and when they came back all data was gone.  The first mention of it is on the forums on the 28th (the post).  I filed a support ticket and got basically the response that Fuitadnet managed to post on the 31st.  A disk array failure had wiped out the data; such things are rare in a well-maintained RAID array but not unheard of.  The mystery of it all is that it is now almost a full month since the disk array failure and several customers are curious where their daily backup is.  Some people seem to have received restores from October, but that’s really odd since we’re all paying higher rates for daily backups.  I made a post pointing out that faster revelation of severe problems and better damage control could keep people more happy, which was met with a response from the Fuitadnet president that:

  • The forums are apparently low priority and will not be used for timely reports of service outages.
  • The staff is working hard to restore everyone to a normal state as quickly as possible.
  • I should ignore the forums, support system, and live phone support (part of the reason for increased rates) and use the IRC chat for proof that they are dedicated to restoring normalcy.

I’ve filed a support ticket expressing an interest in a restore along with a trial of posts in their support forums expressing this interest.  I’ve had no response.  I am lazy and I don’t want to switch hosts, but it appears that Fuitadnet is content to just let their customers deal with problems and can’t deliver on their promises.

Bother

July 21, 2007

Looks like self-hosted WordPress blogs aren’t supported by the Facebook app, but they will add them if it’s popular. Here’s hoping it gets popular because I like hosting it myself.

So this is almost what I wanted

July 21, 2007

See, I already have a WordPress blog running on my website and I was kind of hoping this would somehow link that to Facebook; surely there’s a way?


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.